Justice Moon Hyung-bae delivered the court’s ruling in a televised address, where he revealed the verdict against Yoon by a unanimous vote.

Moon noted that “the impeachment petition in this case is lawful” and later said “Yoon's exercise of emergency powers cannot be justified.” The court also confirmed that Yoon issued an order to dissolve the National Assembly during the crisis and ordered the warrantless arrest of opposition lawmakers.

“There was no lawful deliberation or Cabinet meeting regarding Yoon's declaration of martial law,” Moon said. “This violated the procedures stipulated by the Constitution and the law.”

The decision further stated that Yoon violated the political neutrality of the military and compromised the independence of the judiciary.

"The lifting of martial law by the National Assembly was the result of public resistance, not Yoon's intention,” Moon noted, calling Yoon’s deployment of troops to the National Assembly building to obstruct the Assembly’s vote on the declaration as a violation of the law.

Yoon still faces criminal court proceedings on charges of insurrection which are being handled by the Seoul Central District Court.

Yoon was impeached by the National Assembly on Dec. 14 in response to his short-lived declaration of martial law which plunged the country into political chaos on Dec. 3. The National Assembly quickly passed a resolution requiring the state of martial law to be lifted, with all 190 members present of 300 voting in favor.

During approximately six hours of martial law, armed soldiers forcibly entered the National Assembly’s main building as political activities had been prohibited under Yoon’s declaration. Yoon defended the declaration as an act of governance meant to defend the country from “North Korean communist forces” and to “eradicate the shameless pro-North, anti-state forces,” the latter ostensibly referring to the country’s opposition, led by the Democratic Party of Korea.

Following his impeachment, Yoon ignored summonses issued by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO), leading to a standoff between authorities attempting to execute a warrant for Yoon’s arrest were blocked on multiple occasions by personnel of the Presidential Security Service (PSS).

Yoon was eventually detained on the morning of Jan. 15 and taken for questioning by CIO officials in a non-violent operation after troops assigned to assist PSS personnel in protecting the president refused to further obstruct efforts to detain him.

In his absence, both Prime Minister Han Duck-soo and Minister of Economy and Finance Choi Sang-mok assumed the duties of the presidency in an acting capacity, the former being impeached himself on Dec. 27 and returning to office after his impeachment was overturned by the Constitutional Court on March 24.

This story will be updated as more details become available.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued a warrant for Duterte’s arrest for suspected crimes against humanity relating to his signature war on drugs, which served as a major pillar of his successful bid for the presidency in 2016.

The war on drugs was a controversial and violent anti-narcotics campaign that aimed to eradicate illegal drug use and trafficking. Upon taking office, Duterte encouraged police and vigilantes alike to carry out aggressive crackdowns, leading to the deaths of thousands of suspected drug users and dealers, often in extrajudicial killings.

The campaign drew the ire of human rights groups, the United Nations, and the ICC. They accused Duterte of crimes against humanity, citing reports of police abuses, lack of due process, and the targeting of poor communities. Despite domestic and international condemnation, Duterte has remained defiant, maintaining that his campaign saved lives by reducing crime, though critics argue it undermined the rule of law and institutionalized violence.

Speaking in Hong Kong shortly before returning to the Philippines, Duterte expressed his lack of concern surrounding an impending warrant from the ICC. "If this is truly my fate in life, it's okay, I will accept it,” he said. “They can arrest me, imprison me.”

Appearing with Duterte in Hong Kong was his daughter, Sara, who is currently serving as vice president and will face trial in the country’s Senate after being impeached by the House of Representatives in February. Sara Duterte campaigned in 2022 with Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., who succeeded her father as president, though the alliance between the two families has since fractured severely.

Regarding the arrest, Duterte’s legal counsel has called it unlawful and claimed that police did not allow any of Duterte’s lawyers to be present when the warrant was served.

This story will be updated as more details become available.

The operation which brought Yoon into custody was undertaken by a multijurisdictional team composed of over 1,000 personnel. Yoon has agreed to appear for questioning by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) despite previously defying summons relating to the matter and maintaining that the investigation into his declaration of martial law is illegal.

The arrest marks the culmination of a period of slowly slipping guardrails around Yoon in the aftermath of his short-lived martial law declaration.

Following the declaration, Yoon was impeached by the National Assembly on Dec. 14, meaning he was immediately suspended from executing the duties of the presidency. Prime Minister Han Duck-soo then assumed the position of acting president but was likewise impeached less than two weeks later.

On Friday, Jan. 10, Park Jong-joon resigned from his post as chief of presidential security while Acting President Choi Sang-mok called for bipartisan cooperation to launch an independent investigation into the martial law crisis.

On Tuesday, Defense Ministry spokesperson Lee Kyung-ho announced that troops assigned to guard the president’s residence under the command of the Presidential Security Service (PSS) would no longer obstruct investigators' efforts to enter the premises as they had previously.

The previous attempt to detain Yoon at his residence in Seoul on Jan. 3 was thwarted when members of the PSS denied police forces and investigators from the CIO entry to Yoon’s residence. This resulted in a tense standoff lasting approximately six hours before the CIO suspended the attempt.

Shortly before the attempt, and in the interim, large crowds gathered around the residence demonstrating both in favor of Yoon’s detainment and in his defense, further complicating the situation for law enforcement and security officials.

There were no reports of violence or injury during the second, successful attempt to bring Yoon into custody. South Korea’s Constitutional Court will launch the second hearing in Yoon’s impeachment trial on Friday, Jan. 16, regardless of whether or not Yoon appears.

The conflict between Hamas and Fatah dates back to the early 2000s. Hamas, an Islamist militant group, controls the Gaza Strip, while Fatah, a more secular organization, administers parts of the West Bank under the Palestinian Authority. The two factions have had a tumultuous relationship, marked by sporadic violent clashes and failed reconciliation attempts. This internal division has weakened the Palestinian cause on the international stage and complicated efforts to negotiate peace with Israel.

China's involvement in brokering the unity deal is notable, following last year’s diplomatic achievement in securing a reconciliation agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Traditionally, the United States has been the primary mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, China's diplomatic engagement demonstrates both its ambitions to play a more prominent role in the region, and its ability to do so. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi emphasized that the agreement between Hamas and Fatah is a step towards achieving Palestinian unity and, ultimately, peace in the region.

The declaration signed in Beijing outlines a framework for forming a joint government that includes both Hamas and Fatah. While specific details of the agreement have not been fully disclosed, it is understood that the unity government will aim to oversee the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. The factions have also agreed to hold elections, the first since 2006, although a timeline has not been set.

Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh and Fatah representative Jibril Rajoub were present at the signing ceremony. Both leaders expressed optimism about the future, stressing the importance of unity in facing the challenges posed by the Israeli occupation. "This agreement marks a new chapter in our struggle for freedom and justice," Haniyeh stated, while Rajoub highlighted the need for international support to ensure the success of the unity government.

The reaction to the unity deal has been mixed. Within Palestine, there is cautious optimism. Many Palestinians hope that a unified government will lead to improved governance and better living conditions, especially in the Gaza Strip, which has endured an Israeli blockade since 2007 and has become a war zone since October 7th. However, there are also concerns about the feasibility of the agreement given the deep-seated mistrust between the two factions.

Israel has expressed skepticism about the unity deal, particularly regarding the involvement of Hamas, which it considers a terrorist organization. Israeli officials have stated that any Palestinian government must recognize Israel's right to exist and renounce violence. The Israeli government has also called on the international community to hold the Palestinian factions accountable to these principles.

The United States has also responded cautiously. While the U.S. supports efforts towards Palestinian unity, it has reiterated its position that Hamas must meet the conditions set by the Quartet on the Middle East: recognizing Israel, renouncing violence, and adhering to previous agreements.

The unity deal comes at a time of heightened tension in the Middle East. The ongoing war in Gaza has resulted in heavy casualties and widespread destruction. The conflict has drawn in regional players, with countries like Egypt and Qatar attempting to mediate ceasefires. The involvement of China in the Hamas-Fatah reconciliation process adds another layer of complexity to the political dynamics of the region.

China's growing influence in the Middle East is part of its broader strategy to expand its diplomatic and economic footprint. Through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative, China has invested heavily in infrastructure and development projects across the region. By facilitating the Hamas-Fatah unity deal, China is positioning itself as a key player in Middle Eastern diplomacy, potentially challenging the traditional dominance of the United States.

The signing of the unity declaration between Hamas and Fatah in Beijing could represent a new milestone in Palestinian politics. While the path to a unified Palestinian government is fraught with challenges, the agreement offers a glimmer of hope for a more cohesive approach to the Palestinian struggle for statehood. The successful mediation by China is another success for its burgeoning diplomatic authority and may be a sign of shifting Middle East's power dynamics.

Kissinger’s consulting firm, Kissinger Associates Inc., announced his passing on Wednesday (Nov. 29).

Kissinger's diplomatic career was distinguished by his role as national security advisor and Secretary of State under Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. He was instrumental in shaping U.S. foreign policy during the 1970s, and carried on as one of the most well-known foreign policy figures after his time in office ended in 1977.

Perhaps his most significant contribution was his role in opening relations between the United States and China. In the early 1970s, against the backdrop the Cultural Revolution and Cold War tensions, U.S.-China relations were murky and strained. Recognizing a critical opportunity, Kissinger, then national security advisor, orchestrated two secret trips to China in 1971, working with Premier Zhou Enlai in laying the groundwork for President Nixon's historic visit the following year. This move marked a dramatic shift in the global balance of power and initiated a period of engagement between the two countries.

Kissinger's influence on US-China relations extended beyond this diplomatic breakthrough. He was a proponent of realpolitik, advocating for a pragmatic approach to international relations based on power dynamics rather than ideological alignment. His strategies during the détente era reshaped American foreign policy and contributed significantly to the development of Sino-U.S. relations.

In July, Kissinger made a surprise visit to China, meeting with defense and foreign affairs officials as well as President Xi Jinping, who referred to Kissinger as an “old friend.” During this visit, he emphasized the importance of eliminating misunderstandings and coexisting peacefully to avoid confrontation. He stressed that neither the United States nor China could afford to view the other as an opponent, calling for wisdom, cooperation, and common development, and urging the militaries of both countries to strengthen communication and work towards peace and stability.

Kissinger's legacy in American foreign policy, particularly toward China, is monumental, and his influence on American foreign policy remains a key component of the field of modern international relations.

He is survived by his wife of 49 years, Nancy Maginnes Kissinger, his two children, David and Elizabeth, and five grandchildren.

This story will be updated as more details become available.

Subscribe now

Multiple outlets have reported that Li suffered a heart attack while swimming in Shanghai early Friday (Oct. 27) morning. His body was flown back to Beijing pending instructions on funeral arrangements.

Following the announcement of Li’s death, he was praised by Xinhua as “an excellent CPC member, a time-tested and loyal communist soldier and an outstanding proletarian revolutionist, statesman and leader of the Party and the state.” Xinhua further noted that “the obituary notice calls for turning grief into strength to rally more closely around the CPC Central Committee with Comrade Xi Jinping at its core, and to strive in unity for fully building a strong country and achieving national rejuvenation through a Chinese path to modernization.”

Li previously served as First Vice Premier in the administration of Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao, as well as Party Secretary of Hunan (2002-2004) and Liaoning (2004-2007). Once seen as the preferred successor of Hu, Li was passed over for the country’s top offices in favor of Xi Jinping. Like Hu, Li first rose through the ranks of China’s Communist Youth League, eventually serving as its First Secretary from 1993 to 1998. He stepped down from his position as Premier in March of this year and was succeeded by former Shanghai Party Secretary Li Qiang.

Li’s cause of death has been reported as a heart attack by China Central Television. He is survived by his wife, Chong Hong and one daughter.

This story will be updated as more details become available.

Subscribe now

King was escorted by Swedish officials to the Chinese border, at which point U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns and at least one more U.S. official were prepared to oversee the transfer of custody. King was then transported to an unidentified American military base though he is expected to finally arrive at Brooke Army Medical Center at Fort Sam Houston in Texas in the short term.

In the aforementioned statement on the matter, Jake Sullivan, national security advisor to President Joe Biden, thanked “the government of Sweden for its diplomatic role serving as the protecting power for the United States in the DPRK and the government of the People’s Republic of China for its assistance in facilitating the transit of Private King.”

Korea Central News Agency (KCNA), the state news agency of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), announced the decision to expel the U.S. Army Private earlier in the day. According to KCNA, King entered the DPRK because he “harbored ill feeling against inhuman maltreatment and racial discrimination within the U.S. army and was disillusioned about the unequal U.S. society.” These statements cannot be reliably verified or attributed to King at this time.

Subscribe now

It remains, at time of press, unclear why the decision was made to release King, though one official, speaking to The Associated Press under the condition of anonymity, speculated that the DPRK had “decided that King was more trouble to keep than to simply release him.” As a Private, it is not immediately clear what, if any value King would have provided for a foreign power. Likewise, senior officials in the Biden administration have indicated that the U.S. made no concessions to the DPRK in securing King’s release, with one saying that North Korean officials had conveyed to Swedish officials their desire to release King.

At the time of his crossing of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) which divides North and South Korea, King was facing disciplinary action, including dishonorable discharge, for mutliple offenses committed during his time as a soldier stationed in South Korea. It was during a scheduled transit throught Incheon International Airport, where King was expected to board a flight to the United States, that he fled and joined a tour of the DMZ, where he later made his dash across the border and was taken into North Korean custody.

King was described as being in good health and spirit by one official speaking to AP. The Private was declared absent without leave (AWOL) by the U.S. Department of Defense two days after breaking from his planned transport to the U.S. and crossing into the DPRK, meaning he almost certainly will face some form of disciplinary action upon his arrival in the U.S.

This story will be updated as more information becomes available.

Share The Asia Cable